Understanding Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)

But first, what exactly is an SMR? SMR stands for Small Modular Reactor. Traditional nuclear power stations consist of several large custom-built reactors, which are complex and must be painstakingly assembled on-site. This complexity leads to skyrocketing construction expenses and prolonged timelines. SMRs aim to streamline this process by utilizing smaller reactors that can be fully assembled in a controlled factory environment and then transported to their operational sites. While these reactors generate less power individually, a power station typically requires over ten units, making the overall cost per megawatt (MW) significantly lower due to economies of scale. Additionally, the expedited deployment of SMRs allows for a quicker response to energy demands, as reactors can be added or removed as needed.

NuScale: Leading the Charge in SMR Technology

Numerous companies are venturing into the realm of SMR technology, but NuScale is at the forefront. Their Power Module SMR is the sole design to receive approval from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), allowing it to operate in the United States. A significant part of their advantage stems from their pressurized water-cooled design, which mirrors conventional reactors but on a smaller scale. This similarity means that existing safety regulations can be applied, whereas other innovative SMR designs, such as helium-cooled or molten-salt reactors, require new safety standards and regulatory scrutiny.

Each Power Module boasts a capacity of 77 MW and has dimensions of 20m in height and 2.7m in both width and depth. NuScale's SMR facilities, called VOYGR, can be configured with 4, 6, or 12 Power Modules, offering a total output of up to 924 MW—sufficient to power a mid-sized city.

Initially, NuScale projected that a VOYGR plant with six reactors (VOYGR 6) would incur a cost of $5.3 billion, with energy prices estimated at $58 per MWh—approximately half the current costs of nuclear energy. However, these figures remain speculative until NuScale successfully constructs and operates a VOYGR facility. This is where the collaboration with the Department of Energy (DoE) and the Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems comes into play. Together, they launched the Carbon Free Power Project, which aimed to establish a VOYGR 6 SMR plant in Idaho, slated to be operational by 2030.

Recent Developments: A Project Canceled

The Carbon Free Power Project has been active for several years, refining the design and production of SMR technology. This preparatory work played a crucial role in securing NRC approval. However, recent news revealed the project's cancellation due to soaring costs. Construction expenses have surged by 75%, now estimated at $9.3 billion. This increase is attributed to rising prices for essential raw materials like copper and steel, coupled with significantly higher interest rates in a post-COVID-19 economy, which complicates project financing.

The increased construction and financing costs have also led to a rise in energy prices from the VOYGR plant, now calculated at $89 per MWh—52% higher than initially forecasted. This figure would have been even steeper without a substantial $4 billion subsidy from the DoE, effectively raising the cost to around $119 per MWh in the absence of financial support.

As inflation continues to impact costs, projections indicate that by 2030, the effective energy cost, even after subsidies, may reach $102 per MWh—nearly double the original promise made by NuScale.

Despite these rising costs, a report from Lazard estimates the levelized cost of unsubsidized nuclear energy at $97–$136/MWh. Thus, even under the worst-case scenario, the project's energy pricing remains competitive with other nuclear facilities. However, the alarming construction costs present a significant hurdle. Current conventional nuclear projects are estimating construction expenses as high as $8.2 million per MW—an extraordinary figure driven by similar challenges as NuScale has faced. Conversely, the VOYGR 6 in Idaho is projected to incur an astounding $20 million per MW.

Although these elevated construction costs were anticipated, the cancellation of the Carbon Free Power Project was primarily due to a lack of wholesale energy buyers committed to purchasing its energy. The DoE and the Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems required an 80% commitment from wholesale energy providers, which ultimately did not materialize. This reluctance stems from rising costs, additional design requirements, NRC licensing, construction, and pre-operational testing—all of which could further inflate expenses. The volatile landscape of interest rates, material costs, and inflation adds further uncertainty, leading wholesale buyers to shy away from the project.

Prospects Ahead: NuScale's Opportunities

The cancellation is indeed a setback for both NuScale and the SMR industry, but it does not signal the end of this promising technology. SMR technology faces initial cost hurdles, a common theme throughout the history of new technologies. Once these challenges are overcome and production scales, costs typically decrease significantly, as seen with various innovations in communication and energy sectors.

Fortunately, NuScale has another opportunity on the horizon. They maintain a partnership with Nucor, a U.S. steel mill operator that aims to develop ultra-low emissions nuclear steel mills utilizing NuScale's technology. This collaboration does not depend on securing wholesale energy commitments, as Nucor will both operate and consume the energy from the facility. Given the continuous high-energy demands of steel production, nuclear energy remains a viable option for reducing emissions, positioning Nucor as a robust development pathway for NuScale.

In conclusion, while the recent cancellation of the Carbon Free Power Project is disappointing, it does not spell doom for SMR technology. The allure of SMRs lies not only in their potential cost savings but also in their rapid deployment capabilities and adaptability. Even if NuScale's costs align with those of conventional nuclear plants, the advantages of SMRs make them a compelling choice in the transition to net-zero emissions. Thus, it would be premature to discount NuScale's future.

Thank you for engaging with this content! Your support is vital for the continuation of such discussions. For early access to articles and ongoing updates, consider following me and my project, Planet Earth And Beyond, on various platforms including www.PlanetEarthAndBeyond.co, Google News, and Flipboard, or connect with me on Bluesky.

Video Description: Explore the resurgence of nuclear power as new reactor designs emerge, offering potential solutions to energy challenges.

Video Description: Investigate the barriers hindering a nuclear renaissance and the implications for future energy strategies.