Maximizing Development Productivity Through Code Reviews
Written on
Chapter 1: The Importance of Code Reviews
For the past year, my team has focused on making code reviews a top priority, resulting in a notable enhancement in our development productivity. I felt compelled to document this experience after encountering a post on X that stated, "Our team's productivity skyrocketed when we prioritized PR reviews." This realization prompted me to adopt a similar approach, and I believe many organizations could benefit from this strategy.
Results of Prioritizing Reviews
Analyzing our data revealed a significant improvement: the average duration from review to approval dropped from 6.5 hours to just 2.5 hours after we made code reviews a top priority. This shift is likely due to adopting a mindset that emphasizes prioritizing reviews, minimizing pull requests (PRs), and completing reviews on the same day rather than delaying them.
Problems Arising from Delayed Code Reviews
Extended Lead Times
Delays in code reviews directly increase the lead time until release, creating a backlog of work and prolonging the development cycle. This ultimately hampers timely value delivery to the product and negatively impacts the Four Keys metric, "Change lead time."
Increased Risk of Omissions
When multiple reviews pile up, the likelihood of overlooking important details in a single review rises. Addressing numerous accumulated reviews at once can lead to defects and a drop in product quality.
Potential for Conflicts
A longer gap between the initial commit and the merge increases the chances of conflicts. This necessitates additional man-hours spent resolving issues while coordinating with other developers.
Blocking Other Work
Pending reviews can hinder the progress of other developers and team members, especially when there are dependencies on the code awaiting review.
Reasons for Delayed Reviews
Upon reflection, several factors contribute to the delays in reviews:
- Lack of awareness within the team regarding the prioritization of reviews.
- Large differences in pull request code.
- Review responsibilities concentrated on certain members.
- Unawareness of assigned reviews.
To tackle these challenges, my team implemented several strategies:
Fostering a Common Understanding
We regularly evaluate our Four Keys metrics to identify trends, such as increasing development lead times or prolonged pull request reviews. This reflective practice helps us pinpoint issues, allowing us to take corrective measures.
Dividing Pull Requests into Smaller Segments
Large pull requests can be daunting, leading to increased review burdens and potential omissions. To alleviate this, we established a guideline that PRs should be as granular as possible. For instance, we often create PRs based on distinct layers, such as separating the use case and handler, or focusing on just the interface to enable parallel implementation.
Equal Distribution of Review Responsibilities
We ensure an even distribution of review tasks within the team. Implementing a round-robin system in GitHub for automatic reviewer assignments helps maintain balance. For significant changes or complex tasks, we involve the entire team in the review process.
Cultivating a Habit of Timely Reviews
By emphasizing the importance of timely reviews, we aim to minimize PR sizes and ease the overall review burden. This proactive approach leads to shorter lead times and improved productivity.
As we continue to prioritize code reviews, I am optimistic that these practices will yield further enhancements in our development process.
The first video titled "14.5 Create: Code Review Prioritization Exercise" offers insights into effectively prioritizing code reviews, which aligns with our team's experience.
The second video, "Code Review - Review is the Manager's Job • John Barton • YOW! 2018," provides valuable perspectives on the managerial aspects of code reviews, further emphasizing their significance.
Visit us at DataDrivenInvestor.com
Subscribe to DDIntel here.
Have a unique story to share? Submit to DDIntel here.
Join our creator ecosystem here.
DDIntel captures notable content from our main site and popular DDI Medium publication. Explore more insightful works from our community.
Follow us on LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook.