Bursting the Myth

The notion that a singular study—or even several, if they existed—could dictate that “mastery” of any skill requires a specific timeframe is absurd.

From my experience with credible research, I can confidently state that there’s no reliable evidence that “mastery” of any skill necessitates the same amount of time for everyone. For instance, if we both aimed to master the piano, it might take me 50,000 hours (or more), whereas you could achieve it in just 100 hours, and someone nearby might only need 50. Our differences make such generalizations impossible.

What if Mastery is Just a Social Construct?

Consider this: what if the idea of “mastery” is merely subjective nonsense? Who has the authority to define what “mastery” really is? Using the piano example again, how would we ascertain if someone has achieved “mastery”? Is there an official committee that certifies piano mastery? Reflect on those questions for a moment.

In my years of consulting and public speaking, I’ve encountered numerous individuals who believe that attaining “mastery” in any field requires extensive time investment. Many feel trapped by the belief that they need to achieve “mastery” to be successful, often viewing it as an elusive goal.

If Mastery is Key, How Long Does it Truly Take?

If “mastery” were truly essential for success, how long would it take to achieve? The person who claims that “mastery” requires X hours may simply be reflecting their own experience—if they’ve achieved it at all. They might be projecting their beliefs. Many have reached excellence without investing countless hours. Perhaps they’ve attained “mastery” but lack the official recognition that comes with it.

Breaking the Barrier

It seems that many speakers, authors, and self-proclaimed “gurus” fear that you might see through the facade of “mastery.” Why? Because if the chasm of “mastery” were eliminated, the distance between them and us would also shrink. If it became widely accepted that one doesn’t need 10,000 hours (or even 100) to succeed, more individuals would likely feel empowered to pursue their ambitions, rather than resigning themselves to a life of despair.

Consider the following scenario:

I know a college professor who has taught marketing for nearly four decades. He confesses he doesn’t enjoy his work and admits he isn’t a good teacher—something I can affirm. Despite his four decades of experience, does that equate to “mastery”?

Conversely, a friend of mine began learning piano through an online self-teaching program. With no prior musical experience (aside from playing the recorder in school), she was told by local instructors that it would take her a decade to achieve excellence and decades more for mastery. Balancing work and family life, she has made remarkable progress in less than two years. Has she reached “mastery”? Perhaps. Interestingly, she was motivated to start this self-teaching program because the traditional instructors had created a significant divide between where she was and where she aspired to be.

The Bigger the Gap, the Greater the Anxiety.

The concept of “mastery” is often wielded by those who are insecure. I observe this frequently. Someone who has dedicated considerable time to honing a single skill often insists, “I’ve spent years focusing on this, and I can tell you how to achieve mastery! If you’re a jack of all trades, you’re a master of none!!!”

Really?

What if I could attain “mastery” in a fraction of the time? That might be disappointing to the one who has invested so many hours. For example, is a self-proclaimed sushi master truly superior to someone who can expertly make both sushi and pasta? Absolutely, you can excel in multiple areas compared to someone who has focused solely on one.

Mastery Meets Reality

The assumptions surrounding “mastery” are flawed on many levels. There’s no substantial evidence to suggest that mastering a skill or ability must take a certain amount of time. If someone tries to convince you otherwise, here’s what to do:

1. Share this article with them.
2. Ask them to provide peer-reviewed scientific studies that prove otherwise.

Debunking the myth of “mastery” is bad news for self-proclaimed experts and gurus. They prefer to keep this information under wraps.

Moreover, there’s no data supporting the idea that spending more time on a task necessarily leads to improvement. If someone has been a poor teacher for forty years, that experience does not constitute “mastery.” The harsh truth for these self-proclaimed experts is that nothing indicates that a person has limitations in becoming exceptional at any skill in a relatively short timeframe.

A phrase I particularly enjoy comes from the Eagles’ song, “Already Gone”: “So often times it happens that we live our lives in chains, and we never even know we have the key.” We often act as our own jailers.

There’s no evidence suggesting that anyone is inherently incapable of becoming exceptional at anything in a short period.

If I claim to have achieved mastery, and you begin your journey at, say, sixty years old, I can use the idea of “mastery” as a tool to create a wider gap. This gap can generate anxiety and foster insecurity. Consequently, you may find yourself spending excessively on various resources to bridge that divide. Your guru will sell you a system, accessories, and perhaps even a subscription to an exclusive club, all with the implied promise of shortening the distance to where they are.

What they don’t want you to realize is that you could not only reach your goals but also excel beyond their abilities in a shorter timeframe. Remember this: success in any endeavor requires a plan, but there is no set timeline.

In the meantime, do yourself a favor—stop listening to anyone discussing “mastery” and how it can be attained by purchasing their systems. The concept of “mastery” is simply a game, and we are capable of so much more than that. Have a fantastic day!

Please spread the word… about SWERD!

Please follow me here on MEDIUM to learn how to become BETTER.