# Rethinking "Just Hire the Best Person": The Hidden Dangers
Written on
Understanding the Phrase
When advocating for diversity in the tech industry, one of the most common responses I encounter is the well-meaning yet misleading phrase: "Just hire the best person for the job." At first glance, this sentiment appears reasonable, but a closer examination reveals a troubling undertone.
This notion resonates with the American ideal that individuals should be able to achieve success through their own efforts. It embodies the spirit of opportunity that defines the nation. However, every time I hear this phrase in discussions about diversity, it evokes a sense of discomfort.
Oversimplification of a Complex Issue
This phrase serves as a simplistic answer to a multifaceted issue. Many of those who use it often do not recognize the lack of diversity in tech as a serious problem. The absence of varied representation in technology is not merely a hiring issue; it encompasses broader cultural, economic, and educational challenges. Addressing these obstacles requires a comprehensive approach, including initiatives like scholarships for underrepresented groups and transforming the tech culture to appeal to a wider audience.
Efforts like these are vital, as they can cultivate a more inclusive environment where diversity can thrive. Unfortunately, relying on a cliché fails to address the depth of this issue.
The Myth of Quotas
The insistence on hiring the best person often seems to be a reaction against the idea of quotas in hiring. However, it’s worth noting that legally mandated hiring quotas have been declared unconstitutional since 1978, with recent rulings reaffirming this stance. While some companies may implement voluntary diversity initiatives, the reality is that legally enforced quotas are virtually nonexistent in tech roles.
Can we now move past the quota debate?
Unspoken Biases
The phrase "just hire the most qualified person" often conceals a bias that many may not even recognize. Implicitly, it suggests that the tech industry primarily favors white men, while women and people of color are viewed as less competent in technical fields. This perspective implies that efforts to promote diversity mean lowering standards, which is a misconception.
In fact, increased competition can elevate standards. For instance, Carnegie Mellon University implemented strategies to attract a more diverse student body in its Computer Science program. As a result, they saw an overall rise in applications, which allowed them to enhance their selection criteria.
Addressing the Root Causes
The lack of diversity in tech is not solely the fault of biased hiring practices. If women and people of color are not even applying for these roles, how can we expect to hire them? In my two decades of experience in tech hiring, it’s common to find few, if any, female or minority applicants for open positions.
Furthermore, many women currently in tech transitioned from other roles within their organizations rather than following a traditional educational path. The industry is evolving, and so should our understanding of the barriers that exist.
As society progresses, we must be mindful of the language we use and its potential harm. What may have been acceptable in the past can reinforce harmful stereotypes today. It’s crucial to remain aware and strive for a more inclusive dialogue that respects all individuals, not merely out of political correctness, but from a genuine desire to foster understanding and compassion.