# Reassessing Moore’s Law: Future Prospects and Challenges
Written on
Chapter 1: Understanding Moore's Law
Recent research offers a fresh perspective on Moore's Law. To fully grasp its significance, let's first clarify what Moore's Law entails.
Moore's Law is not a strict “law” but rather an observation. The term derives from Gordon Moore, the co-founder of Fairchild Semiconductor and Intel, who made this observation. In 1965, while writing a forecast for Electronics magazine's 35th anniversary, he noted, “Cramming more components onto integrated circuits.” He observed that the complexity for minimum component costs was increasing at an approximate rate of twofold each year. He predicted that this trend would likely persist in the near future, potentially remaining stable for at least a decade. This foresight suggested that by 1975, the number of components per integrated circuit at minimal cost would reach 65,000.
By the time 1975 arrived, Moore adjusted his prediction, stating that the transistor count in densely packed integrated circuits (ICs) would double roughly every two years. Because this prediction proved accurate, it became known as “Moore’s Law.” As of 2021, the question arises: when will Moore's Law reach its limits?
A recent study seeks to analyze past trends to forecast future constraints, exploring the barriers that may still be overcome just as previous challenges were.
Section 1.1: Recent Study Overview
This research, published in the Open Access journal PLOS on August 18, 2021, examines historical data on integrated circuits. To ensure consistency, the researchers focused on data from Fairchild and Intel, given their long-standing contributions to the industry. They selected the highest density product available each year for their analysis.
One critical issue addressed was the variation in chip sizes. Simply counting the number of transistors per chip does not provide a comprehensive understanding. To tackle this, the researchers determined the average number of transistors per unit area.
Section 1.2: Findings on Transistor Density
The study identified six distinct phases of transistor density increases. Each phase typically lasted around 9.5 years, with the initial six years yielding a tenfold increase followed by approximately three years of stagnation.
This observation indicates that the conventional understanding of Moore’s Law as purely exponential growth oversimplifies the actual data. A more nuanced model offers a clearer picture of the historical trends.
Why do these six phases occur, with periods of rapid growth followed by pauses? This pattern may stem from business economics, as companies strive to balance revenue generation from established products with competition from newer technologies.
Chapter 2: Future Implications
As we look ahead, we must consider the fundamental physical laws that will impose limits on technological advances. Fortunately, these limits are significantly beyond current capabilities, meaning we have not yet reached a technological dead-end.
However, immediate challenges such as thermal limits and rising costs present obstacles. If each new generation of technology requires increasing financial investment, it could become unsustainable for businesses.
The next wave of improvements is anticipated soon, driven by the demand for greater processing power for AI applications and the needs of automated vehicles, which require extensive data processing.
The first video, "Is Moore's Law Dead? in 2022," explores the current state and future of Moore's Law, offering insights into its potential decline and what that means for technology.
The second video, "What is Keeping Moore's Law Alive?" discusses factors contributing to the longevity of Moore's Law and the innovations that may sustain it.
The research speculates that while transistor density may eventually plateau, one or two more phases of growth could still occur.
Advancements in software optimized for parallel computing, driven by multicore processors, represent a significant avenue for enhancing processing power. Ongoing research into nanotransistors and quantum computing also holds promise. For instance, Alphabet's 2019 announcement of a breakthrough in quantum computing with the “Sycamore” processor demonstrated a task completion that would take traditional supercomputers thousands of years.
Summary
The trajectory of technological advancement is not linear but rather characterized by cycles of acceleration and deceleration. This study presents an alternative model to Moore's Law that may offer a more accurate representation of future developments. Current evidence suggests we might anticipate one or two additional waves of growth, translating to an estimated 7-22 more years of applicability for Moore's Law. Observing how these trends unfold will be intriguing.