How the News Media Affects Our Mental Health and Decision-Making
Written on
Chapter 1: The Accessibility of News
In today's world, consuming news is more convenient than ever. Our smartphones, social media platforms, and television channels provide an endless stream of curated content that is designed to be captivating. Headlines that evoke fear, outrage, or shock tend to draw us in more than neutral news.
While being informed about global events is undoubtedly beneficial—enhancing our travel, living choices, and political awareness—the easy access to this information can also have negative repercussions. Sometimes, the content we consume can be detrimental to our mental health. This isn't limited to biased or false narratives; even factual reporting can influence our psychology in ways that adversely affect our decision-making abilities.
New insights from research conducted in February 2019 by a team of European scientists shed light on this issue. They explored the psychological consequences of threats encountered directly versus those learned about indirectly. The study involved a straightforward experiment where participants were shown either a blue or a yellow block on a screen, with one of the blocks linked to a painful electric shock. Depending on their assigned group, participants either experienced the shock themselves, observed another participant receiving it, or were merely informed about the shock without experiencing it.
In this initial "conditioning phase," participants learned to associate each color block with either a threat response (the anticipation of an electric shock) or a neutral one.
> This study highlights the psychological parallels between direct experiences and second-hand information, akin to how we receive news.
Section 1.1: Learning from Observation
The researchers aimed to investigate how these varying experiences influenced decision-making related to perceived threats. Following the conditioning phase, all participants engaged in a task where they had to choose repeatedly between the blue and yellow blocks. One block had a 75% chance of delivering a shock (the "dangerous block"), while the other had only a 25% chance. Participants were unaware of these probabilities.
The decision-making task was divided into two parts. For some, the dangerous block in the first part matched their conditioned experience, while in the second part, it switched to the opposite color. Others experienced the reverse sequence. This allowed researchers to analyze how each group responded to their prior conditioning in their choices.
Subsection 1.1.1: Decision-Making Patterns
Participants who had direct experiences with the shocks (Group 1) demonstrated distinct response patterns based on the part of the task they were engaged in. In the first segment, those who received shocks from the same color they were conditioned to showed significantly better decision-making than those shocked by the opposite color. This bias toward their conditioning allowed them to learn more efficiently, leading to fewer mistakes.
However, in the second half, when the color association changed, these participants performed worse than those who had initially faced the opposite color. It appeared that those who had a strong initial association struggled to adapt to the new rule, while those who had to navigate conflicting colors early on learned more effectively.
Interestingly, Groups 2 and 3, conditioned through observation or verbal instruction, exhibited decision-making patterns identical to those in Group 1. Despite the different mechanisms behind their conditioning, they ultimately mirrored the same responses.
Section 1.2: Implications for News Consumption
These findings raise intriguing questions about our typical consumption of news. While staying informed about global events can enrich our lives, it also exposes us to sensationalized headlines that can negatively affect our mental state. The more trauma and horror we consume through the news, the more it can diminish our happiness and motivation in daily life.
Consequently, we must consider the effects of our news consumption habits. Avoiding the news entirely might not be the best solution in our modern context, as it could lead to missing vital information and discussions among peers. Instead, we should evaluate our engagement with news media and how it impacts our emotional wellbeing.
Chapter 2: Finding Balance in News Consumption
Asking ourselves whether our morning news routine enhances or detracts from our lives is crucial. If it leaves us feeling sad or unfocused, it may be time to adjust our habits. Perhaps consuming news during less vulnerable moments, like lunchtime, could mitigate its negative impact.
It's essential to be mindful of which activities contribute positively to our wellbeing and which ones do not. The convenience of modern technology can lead us into unexamined routines. By pausing to reflect on our habits, we can discern the costs and benefits of our behaviors. Recognizing harmful patterns is the first step toward change.
While empathy is valuable, it can become detrimental when directed at events beyond our control. Consuming news that elicits feelings of anger and sadness can exploit our emotional sensitivity. Ultimately, learning to manage our attention and energy allows us to allocate our mental resources toward what truly brings us joy.